“The Archbishop of Canterbury announced that he will step
down from his position as head of the Anglican Communion at the end of 2012.” Those words woke me from the slumber I
normally greet NPR of a morning. I am
not usually someone who bounds out of bed ready to work. But this morning I got to the computer just
as my British friends were beginning to get the message. The number of emails that we can generate on
the No Anglican Covenant Coalition list-serve is more than one can read. And we all seemed to be talking at the same
time.
A committee-generated news comment was released with most of
us signing on. English vs. American
language notwithstanding, we were able to get something out in a reasonable time
especially with the time delays from Greenwich to Bangkok. I am awed by this bunch of folks who love the
Anglican Communion but royally dislike the Covenant that has been put before
us. Most of us have real positions we must attend to and still produce enough list-serve posts to gag a maggot.
I have learned so much about the Communion since I began on
this Coalition almost a year and a half ago.
Our polities are so different and our cultures are so different. Everything is different including our liturgy
and even the way that we speak English.
And yet we love the Communion. We
love our nods to history even though they are quite different from what I
thought they were when we began. There
have been some fine articles written by considerable scholars and wonderfully
witty comments in that droll English (dare I say Anglican) humor that I find
still holds us together.
I am not surprised by ++Rowan’s decision. He is not winning the battle for the Anglican
Covenant. And his leadership has been
lackluster for many years now. This does
not take away that he is a good man. He
has been pressured by many—probably by most of us. He is an Anglo-Catholic who is trying to deal
with the Evangelicals in his own church and the bullying of special interest
groups throughout the communion. He has
teetered on the women bishops’ issue trying to keep the Anglo-Catholics that would
rather go to Rome than share their altars with women. He was unable to keep the GAFCON churches in communion with us. There are the Evangelicals who want Biblical
Literacy to be the center of our faith lives.
Then there is the NACC who see the Anglican Covenant the thing that will
eventually fragment the Communion forever. All of this wears on a person. And it has been quite evident of late that he is just plain tired. He is basically a gracious man but of late has been brusque and bullying.
Rowan Williams was chosen for his scholarship. He has a great mind, but he hesitates at his
own scholarship. I am not sure it that
is due to his personal humility or whether he doubts his own work. Now I don’t mind if a person changes his
views. It shows maturity when you can
accept that you are wrong about things and have to change your mind. But ++Rowan doesn’t do that. He just ignores his previous position and
then doesn’t “show his work” when he makes a new statement. It is hard to follow such a man.
Granted, I don’t think anyone could have dealt with
the issues that are facing the Communion these days. And Rowan's own ecclesiology fights with the
loose configuration and good will that holds the Communion together. I know he will be happy to be back in the
arms of the academy to finish out his ministry.
Of course, everyone is speculating on who will replace Dr.
Williams. I would nominate ++Katharine
Jeffert-Schori, but we all know that isn’t going to happen. And better for her too. But I do hope that the next ABC will be
someone who understands this new age we are in and who can stand with a foot in
it and a foot in the modern era. It is
necessary for the future of the Communion because it is this peculiar brand of
catholicity that probably speaks Church best for a future age than any other form
of Christianity including the evangelicals.
4 comments:
I feel the need to point out the pivotal role Saskatchewan plays in the issuing of No Anglican Covenant Coalition news releases.
Of course Saskatchewan plays a VERY important place, Malcolm. It is because you, and Eileen are there.
I wonder how much influence the Queen has had in the discussions, the role, and the impact of Rowan? He serves her first, I think, and then the Church on her behalf? Maybe no influence? But the reality is he has been a far weaker ABC than I hoped for, and truly, the effort to suppress his own understandings and public stances on so many issues before him (us) must take a heavy toll. None of us can manage well the impact of being inauthentic. I imagine he is quite relieved to head back into the comforts of academia. It is where his strengths lie.
From what I can gather from my Brit friends is that there is a group from the ACC, the Diocese of Canterbury, a few bishops ( I am not sure how they are chosen) and I believe the Primates who make suggestions. Then the Prime Minister presents a candidate to the Queen. It will take a while even though the news is full of folks jockeying already.
It sees that there is a tradition of alternating someone from the Anglo-Catholic wing and then one from the Evangelical wing.
These two wings are really far apart theologically. ++Rowan is of the A-C party so we may get an Evangelical and that doesn't seem to bode well for the American Church.
Post a Comment